Another close call

On September 25th British Columbians were given more proof that shipping accidents along our coast are inevitable. A potential oil spill disaster was averted when a cargo vessel struck an object in Douglas Channel, a short distance from the Port of Kitimat.

The Petersfield suffered damage in a collision in Douglas Channel about 40 km south of Kitimat, B.C.
We are relieved nobody was hurt and no oil was spilled -- a cargo vessel of this size could carry close to 10,000 barrels of Bunker C fuel. This incident is another warning that accidents often occur in B.C.’s challenging waters, which is one of the many reasons the Enbridge proposal for crude oil supertankers and condensate tankers is such a concern to so many people. The Enbridge project calls for at least 225 tankers coming into Douglas Channel every year and would result in massive tankers passing each other in the channel and other narrow, confined areas along the coast.

Read about the concerns of local First Nations.
Shipping related incidents occur frequently along B.C.s coast. CLICK HERE to open larger map. Between 1999-2009, there were 1,275 commercial shipping incidents reported on the coast -- 164 for cargo vessels alone.

CLICK HERE
to see the interactive oil spill model that shows how an oil spill from tankers, a drilling rig, cruise ships, and container vessels could affect B.C.'s coastal ecosystems and communities.
 

Descriptions of Notable Major Vessel Incidents along the Pacific West Coast

In 1997, the M/V Kuroshima (4160 GT) reefer seafood ship drifted aground in storm conditions while anchored in Summer Bay on the Aleutian Island of Unalaska, Alaska. The vessel had 743 tonnes (5,700 barrels) Bunker C on board, and 89 tonnes (680 barrels) lube oil. Approximately 145 tonnes (28 barrels) of Bunker C oil spilled, contaminating about 10 km off shoreline.

In 1999, the bulk carrier M/V New Carissa lost anchor during storm conditions and grounded outside of Coos Harbour, Oregon. It held 1,490 tonnes (11,429 barrels) of bunker fuel, spilling 268 tonnes (2005 barrels) when it broke in half. Wreck removal was the major cost of the incident.

In 1999, the engines failed on, container vessel M/V Hanjin Elizabeth. The vessel began drifting about 80 nautical miles from Brooks Peninsula on Vancouver Island towards Cape Scott Islands. The maximum fuel capacity of the M/V Hanjin Elizabeth is approximately 4,000 tonnes (30,600 barrels). It was reported to have over 1,915 tonnes (19,585 barrels) of bunker fuel. The crew was eventually able to restore engine function without further incident.

In 2004, the M/V Selendang Ayu went aground and broke in half at Skan Bay off Unalaska Island in the Aleutian chain. The accident spilled 1,000 tonnes (7,670 barrels) of Intermediate Fuel Oil and 66,000 tonnes of soybeans into the water and onto the shores of the island.

In 2005, the M/V Queen of Oak Bay lost power four minutes before it was to dock at the Horseshoe Bay terminal (British Columbia). The vessel became adrift, unable to change speed, but able to steer, and slowly ran into the nearby marina. It destroyed or damaged 28 pleasure craft and went aground a short distance from the shore. No casualties or injuries were reported and no oil spilled from the ferry.

In 2006, the M/V Cougar Ace, a 200 meter (654-ft) car carrier, listed 80 degrees and took on water in Alaskan waters. Estimated fuel onboard was 428 tonnes (3,385 barrels) of Intermediate Fuel Oil 380 and 103 tonnes (814 barrels) of Marine Diesel Oil. No spill resulted,but many cars were damaged.

In 2006, the  M/V Queen of the North ferry sank after running aground on Gil Island in Wright Sound, 135 kilometres (70 nautical miles) south of Prince Rupert, British Columbia. Two passengers died. The ship had approximately 180 tonnes (1,384 barrels) of marine diesel fuel on board and 2 tonnes (14 barrels) of lubricating oil. The ferry was also carrying 16 vehicles. The grounding and sinking created an oil slick that spread throughout the sound. The vessel and its cargo remain on the seabed.

In 2006, the general cargo (42,252 DWT) M/V Westwood Anette punctured its “day-tank” when it drifted back into a pylon during high wind conditions, despite two tugs attached to the vessel.  The resulting spill released an estimated 31 tonnes (243 barrels) of IFO 380 fuel oil (Bunker C fuel oil cut with less than 5% gas oil) into Howe Sound and the adjacent Squamish Estuary (British Columbia).

In 2007, the container vessel M/V Cosco Busan collided into a pier of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge resulting in the breach of two wing-tanks used for fuel. The total amount spilled was 166 tonnes (1,275 bbls) of heavy fuel oil (IFO 380).

Haisla News Release

October 1, 2009

Kitamaat Village, BC – Kitamaat Chief Councilor says the recent shipping accident confirms the Haisla’s concerns around the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway Project. 

Chief Councilor Dolores Pollard of the Haisla First Nation reacted quickly and strongly to the news that a large ship leaving Kitimat, B.C., had suffered a catastrophic steering failure in the Douglas Channel and struck the shore, causing significant damage to the ship.

“This confirms our concerns around the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project and the need to address the ‘real’ risks involved to our livelihood, which will not be fully addressed via the CEAA/NEB process.”

Pollard stated, “We are thankful no one was hurt, and that no oil or other contaminants were spilled, but this accident clearly demonstrates why northern First Nations and communities require a more adequate process to address the risks involved with shipping of any potential contaminants that will detrimentally affect our way of life.”

Referring to the demand for a public inquiry by other First Nations and community groups, Pollard stated:  “This confirms, we are all concerned about what the impacts will be on our lands and resources. The risks of shipping oil through our territories are real and the impacts of an accident or an oil spill would be devastating to us all.”

Pollard went on to say, “Our traditional laws and our fiduciary duty to our people do not allow us to delegate the responsibility for our lands and waters to others, especially an inadequate process whose terms of reference have not accommodated our interests. International Law, and more importantly, Canadian Supreme Court case law clearly states we have the right to free, prior and informed consent to a project such as Enbridge and we intend to exercise that right fully. Sadly, this accident illustrates exactly why our concerns are justified.”

For More Information Please Contact Dolores Pollard
Phone: 250-639-9361 Ext 110